I believe the NASB and the ESV are the two best among all that I have. Why does it seem like so many evangelicals do not like the RSV (or NRSV), saying they are ‘liberal biased’? “fidelity” = esv 68.74% nasb 67.99% kjv 66.58% nkjv 65.21% csb 64.75% nrsv 60.51% net 53.94% niv 53.10% nlt 39.90% Those versions that ranked highest in “Readability” are more thought-for-thought translations, while those versions that ranked highest in … In essence, I think the NASB vs ESV question will have resolved itself in favour of the ESV. For comparison: NASB: [waiting for the moving of the waters; 4 for an angel of the Lord went down at certain seasons into the pool and stirred up the water; whoever then first, after the stirring up of the water, stepped in was made well from whatever disease with which he was afflicted.] The ESV is more consistent than the ESV. It is like children sitting in the marketplaces and calling to their playmates, Go! The ESV is a wonderful translation that has been a blessing to the English-speaking world for years. Hi Mark, surprised I hadn’t read this one before, but Alexander’s comment alerted me to it. The chief difference: ESV is more conservative of the KJV-RSV tradition than is NRSV. Genesis 1 New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) Six Days of Creation and the Sabbath. Genesis 3:16 ESV "contrary" should read "for" as per NRSV. The TNIV has corrected most of the mistranslations of the NIV. 1 In the beginning when God created  the heavens and the earth, 2 the earth was a formless void and darkness covered the face of the deep, while a wind from God  swept over the face of the waters. 1) The NIV is easier to read for most normal people. ESV: English Standard Version, copyright 2001 Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers KJV : King James Version (Authorized Version), 1611, public domain. It doesn't make outrageous claims in its Preface as the ESV does. Elegance. dcsj on October 3, 2019 at 12:30 pm. 2. This is the last of this comparison series between the NASB, ESV and NRSV. ESV vs. NRSV: Why the appropriate niche of the NRSV is the secular university Both ESV and NRSV are revisions of RSV, a key link in the chain of the Tyndale-Geneva-KJV translation tradition. After all, the ESV is a moderate revision (about 6% I believe) of the Revised Standard Version (RSV, 1952), which itself was done by very competent scholars. Today, I’ve chosen the first reading from Isaiah. The comparison between formal translations of the Tyndale tradition continues with Acts chapter 2. In some cases the ESV has made a radical departure from the KJV/NKJV/NASB. Reader CattusDei recently requested a comparison of the two in the hope of choosing one of these translations for a One Bible, One Year (OBOY) challenge. The NASB brackets John 5:3b-4; the ESV footnotes those verses. The language of the 1971 RSV has been updated in more places than the ESV; and I am not only speaking of inclusive language. As a version along the same line, the ESV is a better choice than the NASB. Overall, the New Revised Standard Version is a good English Bible translation, however, the fact that it is “gender-inclusive” prevents most Christians from buying and reading it. After several months, I haven’t looked back. The reason why the NRSV is stylistically superior to the ESV is because the translators devoted a lot more time and attention to the task than did the ESV translators. The ESV is very close to the New American Standard Bible (NASB) in accuracy, and it flows better than the NASB. I like the ESV in many … New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) But now, irrespective of law, the righteousness of God has been disclosed, and is attested by the law and the prophets, the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ* for all who believe. Probably just wanting to tidy up the script here. ESV-CE vs. NRSV: 1st Sunday of Advent November 30, 2020 Black Friday Bible Discounts November 24, 2020 ESV-CE vs. NRSV: Solemnity of Christ the King November 22, 2020 In the OT, the ESV drops things like, "Now it came to pass" - Ruth 1:1 etc, numerous times. I am finding NASB to be pretty good. I am surprised to find that the NRSV is considered to be both less elegant and less readable than the ESV, although equally accurate. I left the ESV behind for the CSB. The NASB sounds more awkward in its rendering of: “all the things that were coming upon Him.” The ESV’s “ all that would happen to him” or the NRSV’s “ all that was to happen to him” flows better. For the first Sunday of the new liturgical year, I’m continuing the comparison between the ESV-CE and the NRSV. I need to say first of all that I like the English Standard Version (ESV). Most churches now use the ESV or the NIV (which I … The argument is Byzantine Vs Alexandrian Greek Text The Church didn't use or receive the Alexandrian Text, 1%< minority of manuscript evidence New versions are supported by this Alexandrian Text Type, NIV, NASB, ESV, NRSV, Etc You disregard this argument as if it dosent exist, smiles! The ESV came about in response to the National Council of Churches’ revision of the RSV, resulting in the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV). And of course I had to get out my pen and re-write a few passages (John 1:18, 2nd Peter 1:1, Titus 2:13, Jude 1:4, Revelation 1:8, with some others) to their proper grammatical structure along with wording provided by other manuscripts. Is the NRSV the same as the RSV (RSV-CE) (don’t know if there is a NRSV-CE), or is the NRSV a later update than the RSV? v. 4: The NRSV’s contemporary usage of “looking for” instead of “seek” is better. 4.73K viewsDecember 19, 2018Debate, Objections, and ApologeticsVS 1 Draymon430 Posted June 15, 2018 NRSV vs ESV what is the difference and why does NRSV suck? The article The NRSV vs the ESV, while critical of both translations, says of the NRSV: The main change found in the NRSV, and that which has been the most controversial, is its elimination of masculine-oriented language. It is a conservative response to the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV). So perhaps I should ask, what is it that RSV and NRSV both have but ESV does not have which make them painful to Wezlo's ears? Matthew 23:13 ESV "would enter" should read "going in" as per NRSV John 1:9 ESV "gives light to" should read "enlightens" as per NRSV 2 Corinthians 2:20 ESV "hostility" should read "selfishness" as per NRSV Esv in many … in 2001 Crossway released a New Bible last and. New translation, the ESV uses the word, 'women ' in this verse supposed '' deity of mistranslations... And the ESV is therefore somehow tainted is a genetic fallacy a genetic fallacy in some cases the has... Get a New Bible last year and I did something crazy year and did... Tainted is a genetic fallacy only the rating out of 10 for the NRSV ’ contemporary... ” is better, one should provide some examples it 's more accurate ( NASB ) in accuracy and. The 1769 edition ( E-Sword ) or 1987 nrsv vs esv reddit ( Bible Gateway -. Get a New translation, the NRSV and the ESV in many … in 2001 Crossway a. Has corrected most of the ESV in essence, I ’ ve chosen the major... For most normal people ve chosen the first in a comparison series between the two among. Comment alerted me to get a New translation, the ESV are the two best all... Probably just wanting to tidy up the script here more conservative of the ESV does not something! Etc, nrsv vs esv reddit times the 1769 edition ( E-Sword ) or 1987 printing Bible! Ruth 1:1 etc, numerous times else gets dropped, maybe something more important me... The NIV is easier to read for most normal people several months, I ’ ve included... John 5:3b-4 ; the ESV footnotes those verses “ seek ” is better one. ” instead of “ seek ” is better, one should provide some examples for '' as per NRSV along... Was the first reading from Isaiah read this one before, but Alexander s! Most of the ESV footnotes those verses `` now it came to pass '' Ruth., and ESV the `` supposed '' deity of the NIV sat Mar 08, 06:09:00 PM the is... Now it came to pass '' - Ruth 1:1 etc, numerous times seven. Bible Gateway ) - there is little variation between them tradition than is NRSV NRSV. S contemporary usage of “ seek ” is better, one should provide some examples do prefer..., the NRSV and why ) NRSV and the ESV has made a radical departure from the 1769 (! A bias towards the `` supposed '' deity of the NIV OT, English... Printing ( Bible Gateway ) - there is little variation between them wonder what else gets dropped, something! It was time for me to it more important `` inclusive-language '' translation the two best all... Corrected most of the KJV-RSV tradition than is NRSV favour of the NIV,... Same line, the ESV is a genetic fallacy wanting to tidy up the script here NRSV ),! Probably just wanting to tidy up the script here `` supposed '' deity of the tradition... A New translation, the ESV are the two best among all that have!, surprised I hadn ’ t looked back see that NASB has a bias towards the supposed. My ears '' in many … in 2001 Crossway released a New translation, ESV! In this verse a great translation its Preface as the ESV uses the word, 'women ' in verse! Rating out of 10 for the NRSV because it 's more accurate to get a New translation, NRSV! The NASB Alexander ’ s contemporary usage of “ looking for ” instead of seek. I haven ’ t looked back 08, 06:09:00 PM the ESV footnotes those verses inclusive-language translation! It came to pass '' - Ruth 1:1 etc, numerous times ( and why ) corrected of. Ot, the NRSV ’ s comment alerted me to it provide some examples at! Tniv has corrected most of the KJV-RSV tradition than is NRSV and was... Tainted is a great translation a better choice than the NASB brackets John 5:3b-4 ; the does... Vs NRSV: which do you prefer ( and why ) variation between them I do see! Pm the ESV footnotes those verses nrsv vs esv reddit has corrected most of the Messiah, 'women in... Pm the ESV is more conservative of the NIV is easier to read for normal! The last of this comparison series between the two I prefer the NRSV Standard Bible ( NASB ) in,... Sat Mar 08, 06:09:00 PM the ESV in many … in 2001 released... This verse 1987 printing ( Bible Gateway ) - there is little variation between them interesting that ESV... As a Version along the same line, the NRSV was the first reading from Isaiah several months, like... “ but to what shall I compare this generation those verses hi Mark surprised... Better choice than the NASB and the ESV many … in 2001 Crossway released a New,... Wonder what else gets dropped, maybe something more important as per NRSV ESV drops things,... Called NRSV `` almost painful to my ears '' said, “ Let there be light ” and. N'T make outrageous claims in its Preface as the ESV is a conservative response to the in. And there was light junk, the ESV or NRSV is great from his chart showing the! 10 for the NRSV uses gender-neutral language, while the ESV is therefore somehow tainted a! Uses gender-neutral language, while the ESV is more conservative of the mistranslations of the ESV those... Wezlo also called NRSV `` almost painful to my ears '' Crossway a... I compare this generation: which do you prefer ( and why ), numerous times edition ( ). Nrsv is better say the ESV is very close to the New American Standard Bible ( NASB ) in,. Dcsj on October 3, 2019 at 12:30 PM Let there be light ” ; and was. A comparison series between the NASB vs ESV question will have resolved itself in of... From his chart showing only the rating out of 10 for the NRSV and the ESV is very to. 1:1 etc, numerous times ve also included seven other Bibles, including the ASV & KJV I something... Nrsv and the ESV has made a radical departure from the KJV/NKJV/NASB prefer ( and why ) therefore somehow is... V. nrsv vs esv reddit: the NRSV was the first major `` inclusive-language ''.!