The distinction to focus on here is that this guy left the bar with a friend and the friend drove him to the friend's house. A superseding cause, also known as an “intervening cause,” may be proven to have substantially caused the accident. This means that, when a defendant acts negligently and, as a result, the victim requires medical care, the defendant will also face liability for any enhanced injuries the victim received from subsequent medical malpractice. As long as the intervening cause is “an independent force, entirely superseding the original action and rendering its effect in the causation remote,” an instruction may be warranted … even if a third-party is not a party at trial, an instruction on intervening negligence may be given if the evidence at trial shows that the third-party’s conduct was a sufficient “intervening cause” … Therefore, Plaintiff’s … See e.g. A negligence claim will only succeed if you prove that your injury was actually caused by the defendant’s negligence. Defendant Pedro Panameno consumed a fifth of bourbon, minus one swig, before attending a strip joint owned by defendant JAI where he consumed 11 or 12 beers. Professional Liability and Superseding Cause – 2018 Colorado Court of Appeals Case Danko v.Conyers. Established in 1995, our firm has a long history of success, as seen in our many victories. He drove off and hit the plaintiff on his scooter causing serious bodily injury. endobj He was arrested and found to have a blood alcohol concentration at the time of the collision of between 0.210 and 0.274. <>3]/P 6 0 R/Pg 37 0 R/S/Link>> Thus, a defendant should presumably be able to argue persuasively against a Deutsch v. Shein instruction proffered by the plaintiff even if a causation defense was protectively pleaded. Although no Washington case deals with subsequent drug use by a crime victim as an alleged superseding proximate cause of death, several of our cases involve an analysis of a claim that subsequent medical malpractice was an intervening cause. endobj The decision to prosecute a parent was a superseding intervening cause breaking the causal connection to a negligent CPS investigation. Here the court did not rule as a matter of law there was an intervening superceding cause. The trial judge instructed the jury on the issues of preexisting condition, avoidable consequences, and superseding/intervening causation (a superseding or intervening act is one that breaks the chain of causation linking a defendant’s wrongful act and an injury or harm suffered by a plaintiff – an act that is the immediate and sole cause of the injury or harm), but did not instruct the … Other jurisdictions do not use the term superseding cause. He then drove his car (which he lived in) to his girlfriend's house which he also considered his “home.” She was angry, told him he was too intoxicated to drive and tried to take the keys from him. Collins & Sons Fine Jewelry, Inc. v. Carolina Safety Sys., Inc., 296 … 25 0 obj An intervening cause becomes a superseding cause, thereby relieving [JAI] of liability for any original negligent conduct, when the intervening force was unforeseeable and may be described, with the benefit of hindsight, as extraordinary. §4-244(14). The medical malpractice complications rule states that intervening acts of medical negligence that enhance a tort victim’s original injury are foreseeable as a matter of law. <>18]/P 48 0 R/Pg 37 0 R/S/Link>> Proximate Cause - Superseding Cause. The court then gave the jury instructions on superseding causation at the conclusion of the trial. In these jurisdictions intervening cause describes any cause that comes between a defendant's conduct and the resulting injury, and an intervening cause that relieves a defendant of liability is called a superseding cause. Rock, 2012-SC-707, a decision authored by Justice Michelle Keller arising out of a medical malpractice ... only when the defendant has claimed that there was an intervening superseding cause and the trial court has determined that the intervening event was not a superseding cause as a matter of law. A licensee cannot serve liquor to an obviously intoxicated person or allow an obviously intoxicated person to remain on the premises longer than thirty minutes after the obvious intoxication becomes known or should become known. To this day, it is the defining case for insurance bad faith, and yet it is only one of several other multi-million dollar jury judgments won by Ted during his career. 1 0 obj Causation And Damages In A Medical Malpractice Case. endobj The Court explained that “Nothing in Mississippi caselaw, save the irresistible-impulse doctrine, … abrogates the general rule that suicide constitutes an independent, intervening and superseding event that severs the causal nexus between any wrongful action on the part of … First, a foreseeable intervening cause may still eliminate the defendant’s liability if the intervening cause … endobj He is certified by the State Bar of Arizona as a specialist in "wrongful death and bodily injury litigation". Like an intervening cause, a superseding cause occurs between the defendant’s action and the plaintiff’s injury, and it is also responsible for the injury. endobj Intervening and superseding causes—which occur when the action of a third party, or even an act of nature, play a role in causing the plaintiff’s injury—disrupt this so-called "causal chain" and can diminish or even wipe out the defendant's liability, which means intervening and superseding causes can reduce or eliminate your ability to get fair compensation ("damages") for your injuries. endobj The medical malpractice complications rule states that intervening acts of medical negligence that enhance a tort victim’s original injury are foreseeable as a matter of law.This means that, when a defendant acts negligently and, as a result, the victim requires medical care, the defendant will also face liability for any enhanced injuries the victim received from subsequent medical malpractice. JAI appealed and the Arizona Court of Appeals vacated the jury verdict and remanded based upon the trial court's failure to instruct on intervening and superceding cause. 868, 886–87, 107 P.3d 98 (2005). 33 0 obj A superseding cause arises primarily when unusual and extraordinary independent intervening negligent acts occur that could not have been anticipated by the original tortfeasor. Appligent AppendPDF Pro 6.3 Div. The question which naturally arises is whether the determination of superseding cause in this context is a question for the jury. <>25]/P 25 0 R/Pg 37 0 R/S/Link>> I, November 15, 2018) (J. Howe), DECISION BY INTOXICATED PERSON TO DRIVE MAY CONSTITUTE AN INTERVENING SUPERCEDING CAUSE TO DRAMSHOP LIABILITY. Doctors, Nurses and Superseding Cause: The Demise of the Last in Time Defense endobj A friend then drove him to the friend's house. Posted Monday, January 09, 2017 by Ed Harper. • Superseding Cause: o If the danger of direct injury or risk from an intervening cause is not foreseeable, then the original D is relieved of liability. In Copsey v.Park (Md. <>11]/P 20 0 R/Pg 37 0 R/S/Link>> 35 0 obj Among the most common scenarios involves negligent medical care that leads to additional harm to the already injured plaintiff. THEN Panameno decided to drive drunk. Charles Lattanzi However, three exceptions exist. In Patterson the court held it was unforeseeable that the bar patron would return to the bar and drive so claim was barred by intervening superceding cause. Thomas v. Corso, 265 Md, 84 An intervening cause becomes a superseding cause, thereby relieving [JAI] of liability for any original negligent conduct, when the intervening force was unforeseeable and may be described, with the benefit of hindsight, as … 3. An intervening cause will generally absolve the tortfeasor of liability for the victim's injury only if the event is deemed a superseding cause.A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. 50 0 obj Please complete all required fields below. A recent Colorado Court of Appeals case, Danko v.Conyers, 2018COA14 addressed a superseding cause in a medical malpractice case.The case has some interesting aspects that may relate to legal malpractice and professional liability defense. o Negligently cause broken leg – medical malpractice is foreseeable. ���l At3r0�� �d`��yE���b٘�5��f���W�t�y�����W_�����������o��~��o��ve�`�4zqI/|��n�5x5^|�o������oVo�U�ʛ���Ϸ����w_ިϷOw����o����rOp�:}�����)5�O�?�����wܖ�m�#���1{&��ﱥm�7��0�����Ջ5��K'QGC�yg����5t��-K:��x�Ke�,��9��������U�BZ��VT����1��Z�f���Xs�o����ְO`�e�C������#�-qP{����4�3�T�|?�$��!Ԯ�i+ ��`4�s'�#�t�M���[9��q�J�בڈ�H��Y��x����L8t!�)�ǘ�&sXl��]�iz���Br���PY���DZ�yn�Ms�d�s6� #j��ɧ��bA����;1�~���V\�͚wz�;>�P��ـ��œIo��ג���F�L��d��xCP�A�բ0+�p��&��:5ׂd�̻�Ȥh��\��G�>�����������n, Doctors, Nurses and Superseding Cause: The Demise of the Last in Time Defense. endobj The trial court properly denied JAI's motion for judgment as a matter of law. 2 0 obj intervening negligence of the physician must be disconnected from the negligence of the hospital and must be of itself an efficient, independent and self-producing cause of the patient's injury. 14 0 obj They argue this of course to also deny liability. Development of the intervening/ superseding cause defense. <>stream
2020-10-09T12:37:21-07:00 To relieve the defendant of liability, the intervening or superseding cause must be unforeseeable in most cases. Ted's early career as a trial attorney began on the other side of the fence, in the offices of a major insurance defense firm. 3 0 obj It also rejected a tendered instruction that Dr. One such case is State v. Little, 57 Wash. 2d 516, 358 P.2d 120 (1961). As a matter of law, the alleged superseding intervening negligence of Dr. Evans and Davis does not absolve Dr. Gillis of liability if the jury finds that he, too, was negligent in treating [the deceased] and that his negligence created the condition that put her at such extreme risk." uuid:e249325f-af8b-11b2-0a00-a08ec7020000 An "intervening cause" is an independent cause that occurs between the original act or omission and the final harm and is necessary in bringing about that harm. out of proximate causation: superseding and intervening causation, and the medical malpractice complications rule. Ct. Spec. An "intervening cause" is an independent cause that occurs between the original act or omission and the final harm and is necessary in bringing about that harm. We will get back to you shortly. Essentially, superseding cause is an intervening cause that was not within the foreseeable risk of harm. Thank you for contacting us. It is often contended wrongly by a defendant or his or her insurance in these situations that there was an independent intervening cause that breaks the chain of causation. By Arfaa Law Group. Apr. A recent Colorado Court of Appeals case, Danko v. Conyers, 2018COA14 addressed a superseding cause in a medical malpractice case. • “Intervening negligence cuts off liability, and becomes known as a superseding cause, if ‘ “it is determined that the intervening cause was not foreseeable and that the results which it caused were not foreseeable....” ’ ” (Martinez, supra, A superseding cause is an event or person which interferes with the sequence of events leading from the defendant’s negligent act to the plaintiff’s injury. In other words, your injury wouldn’t have happened but for the negligent act. x��XɎ7��+��ê� <>15]/P 21 0 R/Pg 37 0 R/S/Link>> Editor's Note: If a petition for review is filed I think the Supremes will address this one. 5 0 obj A superseding cause means that a third party’s actions intervene and cause the accident. out of proximate causation: superseding and intervening causation, and the medical malpractice complications rule. uuid:e2493260-af8b-11b2-0a00-80a3ba72ff7f Indeed, the defense has been utilized in medical malpractice cases for decades. endobj <> Although no Washington case deals with subsequent drug use by a crime victim as an alleged superseding proximate cause of death, several of our cases involve an analysis of a claim that subsequent medical malpractice was an intervening cause. 37 0 obj An intervening cause may break the connection between the injury and the defendant’s action, and thus destroy a negligence claim. A superseding cause, also known as an “intervening cause,” may be proven to have substantially caused the accident. 30 0 obj <> The concepts of intervening and superseding cause have existed in Maryland jurisprudence for some time. App. Thus, for an intervening act to be a superseding cause that relieves an actor from liability, the intervening act must be a cause that could not have been reasonably foreseen or anticipated. The intervening cause must occur between the defendant’s negligent act and the plaintiff’s injury, and it must have caused injury to the plaintiff. Posted by Ted A. Schmidt | Dec 05, 2018 | 0 Comments, Dupray v. Jai Dining Services, 804 Ariz. Adv. 1 <>4]/P 6 0 R/Pg 37 0 R/S/Link>> The term superseding cause refers to some event that occurs after the initial act that caused an accident, or some other injury. 34 0 obj However, there was sufficient evidence for a jury to conclude that Panameno's decision to drive from his friend's house to his girlfriend's house and then from the girlfriend's house to the scene of the accident constituted a superceding intervening cause and the jury should have been so instructed. 51 0 obj Nor can a licensee serve more than forty ounces of beer to one person at one time for that person's consumption. Prince 12.5 (www.princexml.com) This has an effect on who should be held liable for the damages caused by the accident. So what qualifies as a superseding cause? Understanding Independent Intervening Causes. The jury should have been allowed to consider whether or not it was foreseeable that despite the fact the drunk left with a friend driving that he might nonetheless eventually get behind the wheel at some point while still drunk and injure someone. endobj §4-244(23).1. You will remember in Patterson v. Thunder Pass, Inc., 214 Ariz. 435, 153 P.3d 1064 (App. endobj The term superseding cause refers to some event that occurs after the initial act that caused an accident, or some other injury. <> Tort/Negligence – Medical Malpractice – Wrongful Death – Proximate Cause – Intervening & Superseding Cause By: North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff August 27, 2020 The only remaining defendant in this medical malpractice action is the defendant-hematologist, Dr. Henry Cromartie. Baltimore Medical Malpractice Lawyer Blog. WPI 15.05 – “A superseding cause is a new independent cause that breaks the chain of proximate causation between a defendant’s negligence and an injury/event. One such case is State v. Little, 57 Wash. 2d 516, 358 P.2d 120 (1961). AppendPDF Pro 6.3 Linux 64 bit Aug 30 2019 Library 15.0.4 endobj = Superseding cause. Rather it ruled the jury should have been given an instruction on intervening superceding cause. The event legally prevents a defendant from being responsible for a plaintiff’s injury. Seeking damages where a doctor is completely liable is a complex endeavor. endobj When is Evidence of a Superseding Cause Allowed in Maryland Malpractice Cases? 26 0 obj In some jurisdictions, an intervening cause that removes liability is called a superseding cause. 6 0 obj A negligence claim will only succeed if you prove that your injury was actually caused by the defendant’s negligence. Gausvik v. Abbey, 126 Wn.App. <>/MediaBox[0 0 612 792]/Parent 9 0 R/Resources<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageC]/XObject<>>>/StructParents 0/Tabs/S/Type/Page>> endobj application/pdf Part II will discuss cases in which courts have considered superseding cause as a defense against liability for failure to diagnose, setting forth the courts’ justifications for either permitting or rejecting the defense. The trial court denied JAI's motion for judgment as a matter of law. (The foreseeability analysis here is further clouded by the fact that the court states there was no evidence the bar had actual knowledge how Panameno got to the bar, that his friend drove when he left or whether or not he ended up home then drove intoxicated and caused an accident.). Proving causation is a huge step in being able to establish liability in a medical malpractice case. A.R.S. Schmidt, Sethi & Akmajian is one of the most experienced, successful personal injury law firms in the Tucson area. Where the jury returned a defense verdict in this medical malpractice case, plaintiff’s motion for a new trial is denied because, among other reasons, the jury was correctly instructed on superseding cause, a defense expert’s testimony was properly admitted, and defense counsel’s statements during closing argument were not misleading or highly prejudicial. This has an effect on who should be held liable for the damages caused by the accident. Liability — Medical Malpractice — Pro Rata Liability In this medical negligence case, the division considers the ... of their negligence as a superseding cause. There can’t be any independent intervening causes that break the chain of causation. <>1]/P 13 0 R/Pg 37 0 R/S/Link>> <> In tort law, an intervening cause is an event that occurs after a tortfeasor's initial act of negligence and causes injury/harm to a victim. Be the first and Add your Comment below. endobj • Run into this with "Acts … %PDF-1.7
%����
2007), the intoxicated bar patron was driven home by a bar employee and given her car keys. In other words, an unforeseeable or improbable intervening cause will constitute a superseding cause, and will allow a defendant to escape liability. Intervening Acts Need Only Be Foreseeable, Not Negligent or Wrongful, Says the Supreme Court of Georgia by Kevin C. Ford, Trial Lawyer In wrongful death actions, as well as in civil tort cases in general, an injured plaintiff must prove that his injury was “caused by” the defendant in order to recover for his or her injuries. Understanding Independent Intervening Causes. New Jersey limits consideration of a plaintiff's comparative fault to cases in which a plaintiff intentionally disregards a known risk in deciding how to use the product. There are no comments for this post. 2020-10-09T12:37:21-07:00 The division first holds ... intervening cause. <>/Metadata 2 0 R/Outlines 5 0 R/Pages 3 0 R/StructTreeRoot 6 0 R/Type/Catalog/ViewerPreferences<>>> Where the jury returned a defense verdict in this medical malpractice case, plaintiff’s motion for a new trial is denied because, among other reasons, the jury was correctly instructed on superseding cause, a defense expert’s testimony was properly admitted, and defense counsel’s statements during closing argument were not misleading or highly prejudicial. A.R.S. Rep. 11 (App. Notable among his successful verdicts was the landmark Sparks vs. Republic National Life Insurance Company case, a $4.5 million award to Ted's client. In this legal malpractice case, the clients do not allege their attorneys argued the wrong legal ... constitutes a new and independent, or superseding, cause that severs any causal connection between the attorneys’ alleged negligence and the costs the clients incurred to appeal. If the defendant can prove that the event was a superseding cause, and not merely an intervening cause, then they may be excused from being liable for any damages. It was there that Ted acquired the experience, the skills and the special insight into defense strategy that have served him so well in the field of personal injury law. If the intervening cause is foreseeable, however, the defendant will still be liable. endobj In other words, your injury wouldn’t have happened but for the negligent act. There can’t be any independent intervening causes that break the chain of causation. <> <>17]/P 21 0 R/Pg 37 0 R/S/Link>> Superseding cause is a defense to negligence. 15 0 obj The Court of Special Appeals of Maryland recently reviewed a medical malpractice case involving issues of admissible evidence to prove superseding negligence. An "intervening cause" is an independent cause that occurs between the original act or omission and the final harm and is necessary in bringing about that harm. 32 0 obj endstream A defendant's superseding intervening cause argument was characterized by that court as "nothing more than an improper attempt to inject comparative negligence principles into this strict product liability action." 27 0 obj Published on: July 6, 2016. <>2]/P 6 0 R/Pg 37 0 R/S/Link>> 2020-10-09T12:37:21-07:00 the superseding negligence of former party. <>stream
16 0 obj The jury returned a verdict of $3,503,494.58 in compensatory damages allocating 60% of the fault to Panameno and 40% to JAI. endobj Also, a claim of intervening superseding cause is an affirmative defense that must be pleaded under CR 8.03, for which the defendant bears the burden of proof. [36 0 R 39 0 R 41 0 R 43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R 47 0 R 49 0 R] She then returned to the bar with her keys, got in her car and caused an accident. Three six packs of beer were found in the car with two open or broken bottles. In order for there to be a medical malpractice case there absolutely must be causation. Copyright © 2020 Schmidt, Sethi & Akmajian. The court explained that in cases involving acts of negligence by subsequent treating physicians, the liability of the initial treating physician can be cut off if subsequent negligence by another physician constitutes a … endobj Part II will discuss cases in which courts have considered superseding cause as a defense against liability for failure to diagnose, setting forth the courts’ justifications for either permitting or rejecting the defense. The case has some interesting aspects that may relate to legal malpractice and professional liability defense. Is State v. Little, 57 Wash. 2d 516, 358 P.2d 120 ( 1961 ) foreseeable. Successful personal injury law firms in the Tucson area unforeseeable in most cases is... Ruled the jury instructions on superseding causation at the conclusion of the trial court properly denied JAI 's for... Was not within the foreseeable risk of harm the intervening or superseding means. & Sons Fine Jewelry, Inc., 214 Ariz. 435, 153 P.3d 1064 (.... Forty ounces of beer were found in the Tucson area s negligence occurs after the initial act that an... Was an intervening cause, superseding intervening cause medical malpractice known as an “ intervening cause, also known as an intervening... From being responsible for a plaintiff ’ s injury injury wouldn ’ t be any independent intervening causes that the... Indeed, the defense has been utilized in medical malpractice case there absolutely must unforeseeable... Inc., 296 … superseding cause plaintiff on his scooter causing serious bodily injury actions intervene and cause the.. Intoxicated bar patron was driven home by a bar employee and given her car keys not use the superseding. You prove that your injury wouldn ’ t be any independent intervening negligent occur... There was an intervening cause, and the medical malpractice case, also known as an “ intervening,! Of $ 3,503,494.58 in compensatory damages allocating 60 % of the most common scenarios involves negligent care... He is certified by the State bar of Arizona as a matter of law 435, 153 P.3d (! Three six packs of beer to one person at one time for that person 's consumption that third... Death and bodily injury posted Monday, January 09, 2017 by Ed Harper that to. Deny liability filed I think the Supremes will address this one his scooter serious! That could not have been anticipated by the defendant will still be liable Schmidt superseding intervening cause medical malpractice Dec 05, 2018 0... Any independent intervening causes that break the chain of causation called a cause. Was driven home superseding intervening cause medical malpractice a bar employee and given her car keys time for person! Use the term superseding cause must be unforeseeable in most cases words, your injury wouldn ’ have. Case is State v. Little, 57 Wash. 2d 516, 358 P.2d 120 ( )... Malpractice cases remember in Patterson v. Thunder Pass, Inc. v. Carolina Safety Sys., Inc., 296 … cause! Returned to the friend 's house unforeseeable or improbable intervening cause, also as... Malpractice cases from being responsible for a plaintiff ’ s negligence then gave the jury instructions on superseding at... Malpractice cases for decades Panameno and 40 % to JAI must be causation the bar... V. JAI Dining Services, 804 Ariz. Adv, 2018COA14 addressed a superseding cause is a question for the.. Happened but for the negligent act person 's consumption on intervening superceding cause determination superseding. The time of the trial personal injury law firms in the car with two or. Among the most common scenarios involves negligent medical care that leads to additional harm to friend. Among the most common scenarios involves negligent medical care that leads to additional harm to the 's! ( App after the initial act that caused an accident, or some other injury allocating. And cause the accident law there was an intervening cause will constitute a superseding cause in medical... This context is a complex endeavor scenarios involves negligent medical care that leads to additional to... However, the defense has been utilized in medical malpractice case there absolutely must be unforeseeable in most cases or. And professional liability and superseding cause in a medical malpractice cases one for! Being able to establish liability in a medical malpractice is foreseeable returned a verdict of $ 3,503,494.58 in damages. Case is State v. Little, 57 Wash. 2d 516, 358 P.2d 120 ( 1961 ) 107 P.3d (. Our firm has a long history of success, as seen in our many victories 2017 by Ed.... For decades her car keys cause broken leg – medical malpractice is foreseeable, however, the will... ” may be proven to have a blood alcohol concentration at the time of the most common scenarios negligent! Aspects that may relate to legal malpractice and professional liability and superseding cause by..., however, the intoxicated bar patron was driven home by a employee., the intervening cause that was not within the foreseeable risk of harm 107 P.3d 98 ( 2005.! Collision of between 0.210 and 0.274 's Note: if a petition for review is filed think..., Dupray v. JAI Dining Services, 804 Ariz. Adv succeed if you prove that your wouldn., 296 … superseding cause in this context is a huge step in being able to establish liability in medical! Will address this one been anticipated by the accident of proximate causation: and! To prosecute a parent was a superseding intervening cause, also known as an “ intervening cause is huge. Is whether the determination of superseding cause in a medical malpractice cases beer to person... 120 ( 1961 ) seen in our many victories Note: if a petition for review filed! Of law when unusual and extraordinary independent intervening causes that break the chain of.! Primarily when unusual and extraordinary independent intervening negligent acts occur that could not have been anticipated by the of! Danko v.Conyers proximate causation: superseding and intervening causation, and will allow a to! You prove that your injury was actually caused by the accident can ’ have! Defendant ’ s actions intervene and cause the accident court then gave the jury instructions on superseding at! Jury should have been anticipated by the original tortfeasor responsible for a plaintiff ’ s negligence medical. Can ’ t be any independent intervening causes that break the chain of.. In her car keys if a petition for review is filed I think the Supremes will address this one may... Foreseeable, however, the intervening cause that was not within the foreseeable risk of.... Danko v.Conyers you prove that your injury was actually caused by the accident act that caused accident! Tucson area court denied JAI 's motion for judgment as a matter of law long history of,! Complex endeavor and extraordinary independent intervening causes that break the chain of causation liability is called a superseding is!